Add Cameras Back

[Toast 8]

I know what you're thinking, people will just abuse it like they had done before, but instead of just adding them back into the game, make them immovable and destructible. This way people could have cameras to watch their base but they couldn't physgun them into other peoples bases or if they put a camera in front of another person's base it could just be easily shot and destroyed. If cameras were added back people could go and raid and do other things in the Garnet Gaming DarkRP community more often.

[Dr Turtle 42]

even if you make them immovable, you can still dupe them with offsets

[eXg-Buddha 729]

I don't speak for Garnet or Evity. However, I believe cameras will be added back at one point. It's just unclear as of now, because cameras are highly exploitable. As of now, cameras will remain blacklisted until Garnet or Evity figure out how to fix them.

[Entity 357]

2 hours ago, I Play Games said:

I know what you're thinking, people will just abuse it like they had done before, but instead of just adding them back into the game, make them immovable and destructible. This way people could have cameras to watch their base but they couldn't physgun them into other peoples bases or if they put a camera in front of another person's base it could just be easily shot and destroyed. If cameras were added back people could go and raid and do other things in the Garnet Gaming DarkRP community more often.

Already been suggested, plus you can just think of my idea. Have a prop that is basically spawned in as a "hinge" and when you spawn in a camera and connect it to the hinge then it is perma propped until destroyed or the player has left the game. (Or deleted)

[Kicks 254]

-1. Already had a suggestion about camera's. Even if they are immovable, you can use Adv. dupe 2 to unfreeze it. (This is of course up to Evity or Garnet.)

[Fetn 1,217]

-1 i agree with entity it would be a hassle to remove it.

[eXg IPL4YG4MES 204]

idk m8's, seems too annoying to deal with. All the exploits and crap.

[Nutter 15,194]

Too many exploits, too much server resources being dedicated to a silly feature.

Denied