Jump to content
DarkRP Rules Updated (4/28/2024) ×

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/03/2024 in all areas

  1. Denied ______________________________ Hobos, by definition, are not intended to be on an equal playing field to normal civilians, hence the weapon restriction being added in the first place. A hobo is not intended to be a standard member of society, which means they should not have access to higher-end weapons; You could even go as far as saying that hobo is just a troll/fun job, whose purpose is to give the server a bit of lighthearted fun amidst the other roleplay classes we have. Giving hobos access to other weapons essentially violates the rolepaly logic of them being at the bottom of the food chain. I don't feel as though this is an issue that we should address at this moment in time. ______________________________ Thank you for the time & effort you put into your suggestion!
    2 points
  2. well I see what people mean now when they shit talk gunner he means he thought the time was the same as NLR so NLR is 3 minutes, so he thought the time for this (killing someone after they damage you) was also 3 minutes
    2 points
  3. The job resume script only works for infinite-slot jobs, @1998Corolla @Monkey_withagun (As we don't want someone to be like, spiderman and infinitely hold onto the 1 slot) The reason you guys are set to hobo is because it's likely the only infinite slot job you use or have used. (Examples are citizen, hobo, bloodz/crips member, deliveryman, chef.) Even if the most recent job you used wasn't infinite, the server will remember the most recently used infinite class and set you to that. But anyway, awesome work Garnet. :^) The crab is finally over. (one day my phone autocorrected "crash" into "crab" and Garnet, Conway, and Harus called crashes "crab"(s) for the next 3 weeks.
    2 points
  4. Life has been super busy recently, especially college. I asked merk to extend my rank and I appreciate that he did, but I don't think I have the time right now. Gotta lock in for these last two months of the semester then I'll probably reapply.
    1 point
  5. Some people love to assume things
    1 point
  6. 1 point
  7. Accepted This concept has been placed on the back burner of our development board for possible addition....at some point, maybe? It's a stretch okay. :^(
    1 point
  8. first. LAST. adios!!!
    1 point
  9. ACCEPTED ______________________________ This has been added to our development board for possible addition in a future update, thank you for your time! :^)
    1 point
  10. Denied ______________________________ A hobo's whole existence revolves around annoying people and getting in the way, I would hardly expect them not to irritate the mob boss into placing hits on hobos to get them out of the way. Maybe they know too much? Bottom line is, I don't see this as a necessary change and the community feedback here seems to concur with this idea. ______________________________ Thank you for the time & effort you put into your suggestion!
    1 point
  11. Alright. On top of you stunstick abusing, and refusing to stop after being told, you proceed to call me the f slur in the sit: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/2aSL4QMLJf9Cnn/d1337wklGSAP?invite=cr-MSxVY2QsMjEwNTg4NDk3LA After him dm'ing me, and his post here, it seems plausible. I'm not from the UK and don't know if that's a saying, but re-listening to the clip with that context it could be he was saying that.
    1 point
  12. -1 You already know my stance Hi I’m Player B, to give better context I was damaged by player ‘A’ for 3/4 of my health, I tried rotating with climb swep to hit a nice flank to find out Player ‘A’ had changed position. To which I proceeded to relentlessly try and figure out Player ‘A’ location only to find him a couple minutes later, the rest is history…
    1 point
  13. sounds like player A shoulda finished the job lmao
    1 point
  14. -1 Many times I've been hit its a fun time tracking them down after they run off and killing them.
    1 point
  15. Description: Basically all I am suggesting here is adding a statute of limitations to how long you have after an instance of someone shooting you have to either kill them or shoot back. There was an instance that happened today where I had a report on the server where someone was shot they left then went back to the person 5 mins later and killed them. I think that there should be a limited time that you have to kill them after they shoot you. I honestly thing that once a firefight breaks out then it should be handled then and there. Whatever happens in the fight happens. You should be able to run away and come back at anytime later and then get your revenge for someone shooting at you it should be done then and there. Reasoning: I think this would help to benefit the server in that you wouldn't have to watch over your shoulders anticipating whether or not you would be killed later on after you shot at someone. Not only that but it could help to keep the person from quickly going to grab perks and coming back after regaining full health and armor then killing them. Additional Information: None to give
    0 points
  16. -1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines