Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/14/2025 in all areas

  1. + Age +/- No Active Warns (Multiple prior bans https://imgur.com/a/X9U0rSM) + Playtime (meets requirements) +/- No prior experience -- Paragraphs (Clearly AI-Generated, I could tell by reading them, but here are screenshots of AI detectors for others to see: https://imgur.com/a/QbwZD5Z and https://imgur.com/a/6ei4OST) + Read the Staff Rules -1 There are many factors that lead me to make this decision. First, The playtime paired with your prior history on the server; clearly you only played for the minimum amount of time required to apply and you've had a forum account since 2021 with only one post - being this one. With the number of prior bans and how recent they were, it seems you haven't spent much time in the community to make the improvements you claim to (at least in my opinion). The lack of experience doesn't really matter to me but I can't take anything you say seriously when your paragraphs are clearly AI-generated. Anyone can see they weren't typed by a real person but for good measure, I used a few different sites to show they were over 70% AI-generated. The time you said you could contribute furthers my point about how little time you have spent on the server. Most players wouldn't say they could contribute 12+ hours if they didn't already have a large amount of time played. Alongside these reasons is this clip from @MunchieZ which seems to coincide with my consensus. I cannot give you my +1 because of these reasons, it seems that you are a troll and clearly do not believe anything that the AI wrote for you. Thank you for applying and good luck. Edit: I had the same link posted twice. Fixed now
    3 points
  2. Positive + Read staff rules. + Time to contribute. + Referral. Neutral ~ No warns, which means you've behaved... recently. ~ No former experience. Negative - 6 former bans in a 73 hour span - Banned for homophobia... I see the part where you said you used to be a minge, and that you got banned for some pretty serious stuff, Including: "MRDM, NITRP, and FAILRP." as you said yourself, however i notice you didn't mention your ban as homophobia as "serious"? When it's literally the most serious ban you've got... Oh and also how you crashed out in the middle of a sit (here's the clip btw) and after getting banned for doing just that, you publicly go into the discord saying slurs and even going as far as bypassing the filter? - According to a couple ai detectors, your text shows up as mostly AI generated. -1 lol, bad luck
    2 points
  3. You've got a good application and all of your bans are over a year old so I'm willing to look past them. I haven't personally haven't seen anything bad from you recently so I'm willing to give you my support. +1
    1 point
  4. +/- interactions - bans on record + read staff rules + playtime - ai generated paragraphs overall, this application does seem to be rushed due to it being AI generated which tells a lot about the person and with a clip I saw from @JonnyFlame I can see you get pretty upset when things don't go your way which concerns me with what you'd do in certain situations so its gonna be a -1 DarkRP Mod
    1 point
  5. It's been 2 weeks, and also, it was removed because of how redundant the system is
    1 point
  6. Overall: -1 Positives: -Of the times that I have seen you, you have not caused many issues Negatives: -I have not seen much of you -you failed to provide a SteamID -you did not meet the minimum requirement for the paragraphs -you did not read the staff rules (or brushed over them) -overall the application seems rushed Recommendations: -Rewrite the paragraph portions, keeping in mind the 2 paragraph minimum -Provide your SteamID (request it in game or go to a steamid finder website and paste your steam profile URL) I am more than happy to change my opinion, due to the majority of my negatives being format/missing info related. I will check back periodically and reevaluate in due time.
    1 point
  7. DENIED Your report on @Chawhead at this time is denied. As a previous staff member, you should know that we are not obligated to entertain a request for a higher ranking individual. The staff member taking it may ask for another staff member if they so chose. (That's when you have the right to utilize our forums' report system, which you have.) Moreover, this "satisfactory resolution" that you speak of is only for the person placing a report. You decided you would build ON TOP OF someone else structure. You then claimed you're allowed to build in proximity so it is allowed. Chawhead's behavior was not disrespect for nor inappropriate. He gave you an opportunity to delete it. To that you disregarded, thus me to your report.
    1 point
  8. I have spoke with you and seen you around i believe you deserve a chance it’s been 7 years since that last ban, im gonna go neutral for now ive changed my mind seeing you have even mroe stuff to improve on. But please update your paragraphs
    0 points
  9. ACCEPTED The way that Jay was in OOC is not acceptable of a staff member. As staff we want to maintain a decent level of professionalism. For this he will receive a staff strike and will be spoken with by the HR team. Thank you for taking the time to make this report
    -1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Guidelines